602
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* The system is represented in a quantitative model which simulates its performance under different operational conditions something only possible if the system is simple and the context mechanical. | * The system is represented in a quantitative model which simulates its performance under different operational conditions something only possible if the system is simple and the context mechanical. | ||
* Classical OR Systems analysis and systems engineering are most appropriate for solving problems. | * Classical OR Systems analysis and systems engineering are most appropriate for solving problems. | ||
| Mechanical-pluralist contexts responded to the kind of systems design method proposed by Churchman, and by Mason and Mitroff in their 'strategic assumption surfacing and testing' methodology. | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row"| Systemic | |||
| Cybernetic approaches, such as advocated by Beer and in the socio-technical systems literature. | | Cybernetic approaches, such as advocated by Beer and in the socio-technical systems literature. | ||
Suitable for tackling problems associated with systemic-unitary contexts. | Suitable for tackling problems associated with systemic-unitary contexts. | ||
| The soft systems thinking proposed by Ackoff and by Checkland could minister to problems set in systemic-pluralist problem-contexts. For example, Ackof's 'interactive planning' exhibited, through the participative principle, a method to cope with pluralism and, through the proposed design for a 'responsive decision system', an attempt to come to terms with systemicity | | The soft systems thinking proposed by Ackoff and by Checkland could minister to problems set in systemic-pluralist problem-contexts. For example, Ackof's 'interactive planning' exhibited, through the participative principle, a method to cope with pluralism and, through the proposed design for a 'responsive decision system', an attempt to come to terms with systemicity | ||
|} | |} |