633
edits
→Scientific Contributions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Laouris is credited for the discovery of the dialogic design Law of Requisite Action,<ref>Bausch, K. (2008). Negotiating Social Complexity. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ISSS - 2008, Madison, Wisconsin, 3(1). Retrieved from https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings52nd/article/view/960 p.4</ref> <ref> Flanagan T.R. (2020) Structured Dialogic Design for Mobilizing Collective Action in Highly Complex Systems. In: Metcalf G.S., Kijima K., Deguchi H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_59-1 p. 17</ref> which asserts that action plans not founded on the stakeholders' authentic engagement are unethical and are bound to fail. Together with [[Norma Romm]], having conducted many structured dialogues worldwide<ref>Yang, B., Serrano, J. V., Launer, M. A., Wang, L., & Rabiei, K. (2023). A comprehensive and systematic study on the cybernetics management systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36(3), 479-504. pg 493</ref>, they established the Structured Democratic Dialogue methodology as [[Problem structuring methods|Problem Structuring Method]],<ref>Gomes et al., 2022 pp.; Gomes Júnior, A.d.A., Schramm, V.B. Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade. Syst Pract Action Res 35, 55–88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09560-1, p 763</ref> <ref> Franco, L. A., & Rouwette, E. A. (2022). Problem structuring methods: Taking stock and looking ahead. In The Palgrave handbook of operations research (pp. 735-780). Cham: Springer International Publishing. pg 763</ref> thus contributing to the development of community [[Operations research|Operational Research]] (COR)<ref>Midgley, G., Johnson, M. P., & Chichirau, G. (2018). What is community operational research?. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 771-783. pg 772</ref> <ref>Johnson, M. P., Midgley, G., Wright, J., & Chichirau, G. (2018). Community Operational Research: Innovations, internationalization and agenda-setting applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 761-770. pp. 766, 771</ref> <ref>Júnior, A. D. A. G., & Schramm, V. B. (2021). Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 1-34. pp. 3,15</ref>. | Laouris is credited for the discovery of the dialogic design Law of Requisite Action,<ref>Bausch, K. (2008). Negotiating Social Complexity. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ISSS - 2008, Madison, Wisconsin, 3(1). Retrieved from https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings52nd/article/view/960 p.4</ref> <ref> Flanagan T.R. (2020) Structured Dialogic Design for Mobilizing Collective Action in Highly Complex Systems. In: Metcalf G.S., Kijima K., Deguchi H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_59-1 p. 17</ref> which asserts that action plans not founded on the stakeholders' authentic engagement are unethical and are bound to fail. Together with [[Norma Romm]], having conducted many structured dialogues worldwide<ref>Yang, B., Serrano, J. V., Launer, M. A., Wang, L., & Rabiei, K. (2023). A comprehensive and systematic study on the cybernetics management systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36(3), 479-504. pg 493</ref>, they established the Structured Democratic Dialogue methodology as [[Problem structuring methods|Problem Structuring Method]],<ref>Gomes et al., 2022 pp.; Gomes Júnior, A.d.A., Schramm, V.B. Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade. Syst Pract Action Res 35, 55–88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09560-1, p 763</ref> <ref> Franco, L. A., & Rouwette, E. A. (2022). Problem structuring methods: Taking stock and looking ahead. In The Palgrave handbook of operations research (pp. 735-780). Cham: Springer International Publishing. pg 763</ref> thus contributing to the development of community [[Operations research|Operational Research]] (COR)<ref>Midgley, G., Johnson, M. P., & Chichirau, G. (2018). What is community operational research?. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 771-783. pg 772</ref> <ref>Johnson, M. P., Midgley, G., Wright, J., & Chichirau, G. (2018). Community Operational Research: Innovations, internationalization and agenda-setting applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 761-770. pp. 766, 771</ref> <ref>Júnior, A. D. A. G., & Schramm, V. B. (2021). Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 1-34. pp. 3,15</ref>. | ||
Laouris is one of 12 experts commissioned to draft the ONLINFE Manifesto<ref>https://epthinktank.eu/2014/12/08/what-makes-us-human-in-a-hyper-connected-era/ What makes us human in a hyper connected era</ref> <ref>https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/events/being-human-hyperconnected-era What makes us human in a hyper connected era</ref>for Europe <ref>Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford. pg XII</ref> <ref>Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2019). Posthumanism, open ontologies and bio-digital becoming: Response to Luciano Floridi’s Onlife Manifesto. 971-980. pg 977 </ref> and co-presented it in the European Parliament <ref>https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/science-and-technology-options-assessment_20141202-1700-SPECIAL-UNKN Presentation of the ONLIFE Manifesto to the EU parliament</ref> | Laouris is one of 12 experts commissioned to draft the ONLINFE Manifesto<ref>https://epthinktank.eu/2014/12/08/what-makes-us-human-in-a-hyper-connected-era/ What makes us human in a hyper connected era</ref> <ref>https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/events/being-human-hyperconnected-era What makes us human in a hyper connected era</ref> for Europe<ref>Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford. pg XII</ref> <ref>Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2019). Posthumanism, open ontologies and bio-digital becoming: Response to Luciano Floridi’s Onlife Manifesto. 971-980. pg 977 </ref> and co-presented it in the European Parliament <ref>https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/science-and-technology-options-assessment_20141202-1700-SPECIAL-UNKN Presentation of the ONLIFE Manifesto to the EU parliament</ref> | ||
During his early career in the late eighties and nineties, Laouris applied [[Digital signal processing]] in [[Digital signal processing #Time and space domains|time]] and [[Digital signal processing #Frequency domain|frequency]] domains to [[Single-cell recording|single-cell recordings]] from [[Experimental animal|experimental animals]] to study transmission properties and fatigue of cat [[Motor neurons|motor neurons]], muscle afferents and [[Renshaw cells]]. Together with [[Uwe Windhorst]], they explored the relations between linear and non-linear characteristics in the behaviour of neurons<ref>Gottlieb, G. L., Corcos, D. M., & Agarwal, G. C., 1989. Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(2), 189-210, p 237.</ref> <ref>Herzog, E., Landry, M., Buhler, E., Bouali‐Benazzouz, R., Legay, C., Henderson, C. E., ... & El Mestikawy, S. (2004). Expression of vesicular glutamate transporters, VGLUT1 and VGLUT2, in cholinergic spinal motoneurons. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(7), 1752-1760. p 1759</ref> <ref>Windhorst, U. (1996). On the role of recurrent inhibitory feedback in motor control. Progress in neurobiology, 49(6), 517-587.</ref> <ref>Laouris, Y., & Windhorst, U. (1989). The relationship between coherence and nonlinear characteristics in Renshaw cell responses to random motor axon stimulation. Neuroscience, 28(3), 625-633.</ref> | During his early career in the late eighties and nineties, Laouris applied [[Digital signal processing]] in [[Digital signal processing #Time and space domains|time]] and [[Digital signal processing #Frequency domain|frequency]] domains to [[Single-cell recording|single-cell recordings]] from [[Experimental animal|experimental animals]] to study transmission properties and fatigue of cat [[Motor neurons|motor neurons]], muscle afferents and [[Renshaw cells]]. Together with [[Uwe Windhorst]], they explored the relations between linear and non-linear characteristics in the behaviour of neurons<ref>Gottlieb, G. L., Corcos, D. M., & Agarwal, G. C., 1989. Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(2), 189-210, p 237.</ref> <ref>Herzog, E., Landry, M., Buhler, E., Bouali‐Benazzouz, R., Legay, C., Henderson, C. E., ... & El Mestikawy, S. (2004). Expression of vesicular glutamate transporters, VGLUT1 and VGLUT2, in cholinergic spinal motoneurons. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(7), 1752-1760. p 1759</ref> <ref>Windhorst, U. (1996). On the role of recurrent inhibitory feedback in motor control. Progress in neurobiology, 49(6), 517-587.</ref> <ref>Laouris, Y., & Windhorst, U. (1989). The relationship between coherence and nonlinear characteristics in Renshaw cell responses to random motor axon stimulation. Neuroscience, 28(3), 625-633.</ref> | ||