602
edits
Aristotle's Theory of Substance (view source)
Revision as of 14:14, 2 February 2023
, 2 February 2023→Being said vs being in
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<hr>'''Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing'''. | <hr>'''Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing'''. | ||
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is <u>in</u> the object''''' or | Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is <u>in</u> the object''''' or immanent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]]. | ||
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal. | Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal. | ||