A System of Systems Methodology

From Dialogic Design Science
Revision as of 08:46, 3 February 2023 by Laouris (talk | contribs) (Created page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The starting point was a classification of problem- contexts according to:

  1. The nature of the systems(s) embedding the problem of concern
  2. The relationship between relevant stakeholders

. Systems were seen to lie on a continuum ranging from simple to complex and, following Ackoff's terminology, problem-contexts labelled 'mechanical' if they contained relatively simple systems and 'systemic' if they housed complex systems. Decision-makers could be in a

  • Unitary relationship to one another If they agreed upon a set of goals
  • Pluralist If their objectives differed.


Problem-contexts, it followed, could also exhibit a 'unitary' or 'pluralist' character. Bringing the two dimensions of 'systems' and 'decision- makers' together, to form a four-celled matrix, yielded a classification of problem-contexts as mechanical-unitary, systemic-unitary, mechanical-pluralist and systemic-pluralist. Some brief justifi- cation was provided for the choice of the two dimensions forming the matrix.