Lukes's three dimensions of power: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:03, 30 January 2023

Steven Lukes has identified three dimensions of power.

1st Dimension	Power can actually be seen in use. Different groups use whatever resources they have to try to influence outcomes in their favour.
2nd Dimension	No actual conflict is observed between groups. The powerful succeed in getting their own way by preventing controversial issues from being discussed or because other groups realize they have little chance in a fight. The exercise of power is, however obvious to the less powerful.
3rd Dimension	Even the disadvantaged do not recognize that something is being done against their interests. They accept the situation and fail to recognize their own true interests.

Lukes, S. (Ed.). (1986). Power (Vol. 2). NYU Press.
Jackson, M. C. (1988). Systems methods for organizational analysis and design. Systems Research, 5(3), 201-210.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |-
 |style="padding: 10px" |'''2nd Dimension'''
-|No actual conflict is observed between groups.<br> The powerful succeed in getting their own way by preventing controversial issues from being discussed or because other groups realize they have little chance in a fight.<br>The exercise of power is however obvious to the less powerful.
+|No actual conflict is observed between groups.<br> The powerful succeed in getting their own way by preventing controversial issues from being discussed or because other groups realize they have little chance in a fight.<br>The exercise of power is, however obvious to the less powerful.
 |-
 |style="padding: 10px" |'''3rd Dimension'''
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==References==
 * Lukes, S. (Ed.). (1986). Power (Vol. 2). NYU Press.
+* Jackson, M. C. (1988). Systems methods for organizational analysis and design. Systems Research, 5(3), 201-210.
 [[Category:Systems concepts]]