The Psychological Foundations of Reflective Wisdom - Revision history

Chief ed: /* Components of wisdom */

2020-12-02T16:10:46Z

Components of wisdom

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 2 December 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	==Components of wisdom==		==Components of wisdom==
	[[Implicit ~~theories~~\|Implicit ~~Theory~~]] reveal four essential components of wisdom		[[Implicit Theory\|Implicit theories]] reveal four essential components of wisdom
	# Deep understanding		# Deep understanding
	# Reflective capacities		# Reflective capacities

Chief ed: /* Components of wisdom */

2020-12-02T16:08:59Z

Components of wisdom

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 2 December 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	==Components of wisdom==		==Components of wisdom==
	Implicit theories reveal four essential components of wisdom		[[Implicit theories\|Implicit Theory]] reveal four essential components of wisdom
	# Deep understanding		# Deep understanding
	# Reflective capacities		# Reflective capacities
	# Problem-solving capacities		# Problem-solving capacities
	# Motivation to live well and help others		# Motivation to live well and help others


	==Text from Wisdom Institute==		==Text from Wisdom Institute==

Chief ed at 16:05, 2 December 2020

2020-12-02T16:05:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 2 December 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	#Α refined understanding of wisdom will emerge.		#Α refined understanding of wisdom will emerge.
	#Tiberius began her work to investigate psychological research relevant to philosophical conceptions of wisdom that emphasize reasons and reflection		#Tiberius began her work to investigate psychological research relevant to philosophical conceptions of wisdom that emphasize reasons and reflection

			==Components of wisdom==
			Implicit theories reveal four essential components of wisdom
			# Deep understanding
			# Reflective capacities
			# Problem-solving capacities
			# Motivation to live well and help others

Katerinakako1998 at 11:19, 27 October 2020

2020-10-27T11:19:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 27 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Valerie Tiberius		[[Valerie Tiberius]]

	<youtube width="400" height="220">w0CaLo69oDk</youtube>		<youtube width="400" height="220">w0CaLo69oDk</youtube>

Katerinakako1998 at 10:40, 5 October 2020

2020-10-05T10:40:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 5 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Valerie Tiberius		Valerie Tiberius

	~~https://www.~~youtube~~.com/watch?v~~=w0CaLo69oDk		<youtube width="400" height="220">w0CaLo69oDk</youtube>

	==Short Definition==		==Short Definition==

Katerinakako1998 at 09:31, 24 September 2020

2020-09-24T09:31:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 24 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Valerie Tiberius		Valerie Tiberius

			https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0CaLo69oDk

	==Short Definition==		==Short Definition==

Katerinakako1998 at 09:28, 24 September 2020

2020-09-24T09:28:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 24 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Valerie Tiberius		Valerie Tiberius

			==Short Definition==

			This project defines wisdom by using psychological research on the implicit theories of wisdom together with philosophical reflection on the underlying assumptions behind these theories.

			==Summary Points==

			#The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project.
			#To define wisdom, we need both philosophical and empirical methods.
			#This project develops a definition of wisdom by using psychological research on the implicit theories of wisdom together with philosophical reflection on the underlying assumptions behind these theories.
			#Α refined understanding of wisdom will emerge.
			#Tiberius began her work to investigate psychological research relevant to philosophical conceptions of wisdom that emphasize reasons and reflection


			==Text from Wisdom Institute==

	The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project. The proposed methodology begins with psychological research on the folk theory of wisdom. The folk theory is elaborated in light of theoretical desiderata and further empirical research on human rational capacities. This methodology is an updated version of Aristotle’s method for arriving at ethical conclusions and the resulting theory of practical wisdom is Aristotelian in spirit, though not in detail. A central question for future research is about the relationship between values and wisdom. Aristotle could presume widely shared agreement about some values. What should contemporary wisdom theorists do if such a presumption is no longer warranted?		The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project. The proposed methodology begins with psychological research on the folk theory of wisdom. The folk theory is elaborated in light of theoretical desiderata and further empirical research on human rational capacities. This methodology is an updated version of Aristotle’s method for arriving at ethical conclusions and the resulting theory of practical wisdom is Aristotelian in spirit, though not in detail. A central question for future research is about the relationship between values and wisdom. Aristotle could presume widely shared agreement about some values. What should contemporary wisdom theorists do if such a presumption is no longer warranted?

Katerinakako1998: Created page with "Valerie Tiberius The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project. The proposed methodology begins with..."

2020-09-17T09:20:14Z

Created page with "Valerie Tiberius The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project. The proposed methodology begins with..."

New page

Valerie Tiberius

The articulation of an interdisciplinary methodology for defining wisdom is the most important result of this project. The proposed methodology begins with psychological research on the folk theory of wisdom. The folk theory is elaborated in light of theoretical desiderata and further empirical research on human rational capacities. This methodology is an updated version of Aristotle’s method for arriving at ethical conclusions and the resulting theory of practical wisdom is Aristotelian in spirit, though not in detail. A central question for future research is about the relationship between values and wisdom. Aristotle could presume widely shared agreement about some values. What should contemporary wisdom theorists do if such a presumption is no longer warranted?

The Psychological Foundations of Reflective Wisdom
To define wisdom, we need both philosophical and empirical (specifically psychological) methods. In particular, we need a kind of thinking that draws out the implications of our evaluative commitments and weaves them together into a coherent story or normative theory. We need this kind of thinking in the case of wisdom because wisdom must turn out to be something worth having, something we have good reason to try to develop in ourselves, and something that contributes to living a flourishing life in a deep sense. This project develops a definition of wisdom by using psychological research on the implicit theories of wisdom together with philosophical reflection on the underlying assumptions behind these theories. Through analysis of the empirical work and sustained collaborative conversation with psychologists, a refined understanding of wisdom will emerge. The goals of this project are then twofold: first, it aims to develop, refine and elaborate a conception of wisdom and its psychological foundations; and second, it aims to explore the ways in which philosophical and empirical methods of inquiry can be usefully brought together by using wisdom as a case study.

Tiberius began her work with two graduate students to investigate psychological research relevant to philosophical conceptions of wisdom that emphasize reasons and reflection. One student, Jason Swartwood read and summarized key articles on value clarification, values‐as‐truisms, dumbfounding, debiasing, and implicit theories of wisdom. The other student, MaryEllen VanDerHeyden, read and summarized work on mindfulness, cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and emotional intelligence. This team effort has resulted in a reconceptualization of the project’s methodology, and a recognition that writing a paper on the methodology philosophers interested in defining wisdom ought to use must be a priority. Tiberius and Swartwood have begun work on this paper, which will be presented during the summer 2009 at a conference in Bled, Slovenia. Tiberius and VanDerHeyden have begun work on a paper on wisdom and emotion, which they will complete over the summer as well. In addition to these team efforts, Tiberius presented her paper, “Wisdom and Work”, at Colorado College, Macalester College and at Fordham University’s Wisdom Workshop in April 2009. She also plans to co‐edit (with Eddy Nahmias) a volume tentatively entitled, Wisdom: Readings from Philosophy and Psychology.

https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/about/project-1-defining-wisdom

[[Category:Wisdom Definitions]]