602
edits
Systems Thinking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Reductionist scientific and management methods embody potentially pernicious assumptions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="padding: 10px" |'''Subject/object dualism''' | |style="padding: 10px" |'''Subject/object dualism''' | ||
|* Conceptual splitting of the ‘subject’ (who observes things and is the holder of knowledge about them) from the ‘object’ (which is observed and known). | | | ||
* Conceptual splitting of the ‘subject’ (who observes things and is the holder of knowledge about them) from the ‘object’ (which is observed and known). | |||
* If, following this split, the subject comes to be hidden, the illusion of perfect objectivity is created, as if we can have knowledge without a knowing subject (Fazey et al 2018). | * If, following this split, the subject comes to be hidden, the illusion of perfect objectivity is created, as if we can have knowledge without a knowing subject (Fazey et al 2018). | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
# [[Critical Systems Thinking]] developed by Mingers and Jackson in the 80s. | # [[Critical Systems Thinking]] developed by Mingers and Jackson in the 80s. | ||
# [[Systemic Design]] | # [[Systemic Design]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||