602
edits
Evolution of applied systems thinking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Evolution of applied systems thinking (view source)
Revision as of 07:57, 7 February 2023
, 7 February 2023no edit summary
(separated links for theory/thinking) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In the 1980s, first and second wave advocates came into conflict. | In the 1980s, first and second wave advocates came into conflict. | ||
* <u>Third wave:</u> Third wave authors, initially working under the banner of [[Critical Systems Theory|Critical Systems]] Critical Systems Thinking|Thinking]], argued that the division of the systems research community into two camps was unhelpful, and they advocated [[Methodological Pluralism]] – mixing methods from both traditions. Other authors set out to address power relations during interventions – in particular, the practice of exploring value and boundary judgements in projects in order to address conflict and marginalization. This practice came to be called [[Boundary Critique]], and it was eventually integrated with methodological pluralism in a new approach labelled [[Systemic Intervention]]. | * <u>Third wave:</u> Third wave authors, initially working under the banner of [[Critical Systems Theory|Critical Systems]] [[Critical Systems Thinking|Thinking]], argued that the division of the systems research community into two camps was unhelpful, and they advocated [[Methodological Pluralism]] – mixing methods from both traditions. Other authors set out to address power relations during interventions – in particular, the practice of exploring value and boundary judgements in projects in order to address conflict and marginalization. This practice came to be called [[Boundary Critique]], and it was eventually integrated with methodological pluralism in a new approach labelled [[Systemic Intervention]]. | ||