Marxist-based critique of OR: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Hales (1974),   
Hales (1974),   
Rosenhead and Thunhurst (1982), as well as Wood and Kelly (1978) critiqued OR using Marxist arguments. Their critique focused at technical rather than practical aspects.
Rosenhead and Thunhurst (1982), as well as Wood and Kelly (1978) critiqued OR using Marxist arguments. Their critique focused at technical rather than practical [[Habermas three types of interests|interests]].


<u>Point 1</u>:  OR has a mistaken view of its own purpose and rationality. It sees itself as an objective, value- free application of science to the common good. In fact, it is neither objective nor value-free, but a part of the developing means of production, committed to improving the effective use and control of the workforce.
<u>Point 1</u>:  OR has a mistaken view of its own purpose and rationality. It sees itself as an objective, value- free application of science to the common good. In fact, it is neither objective nor value-free, but a part of the developing means of production, committed to improving the effective use and control of the workforce.

Navigation menu