Aristotle's Theory of Substance: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


<youtube width="200" height="120">rSMLb4ZTZIU</youtube>
<youtube width="200" height="120">rSMLb4ZTZIU</youtube>
==Being said vs being in==
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|left|300px]]
Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing.
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is in the object''''' or imminent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!




Line 23: Line 35:




==Being said vs being in==
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|300px]]
Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing.
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is in the object''''' or imminent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!


{|class=wikitable  
{|class=wikitable  

Navigation menu